Educational Material

3.4 GNSS Error Budget

Learn more about pseudorange errors and dilution of precision.

The GNSS error budget describes the many factors involved in the GNSS system that determines how accurately a receiver may determine its position, velocity, and time (PVT). Knowledge of these error sources is useful in determining issues that may occur while using a GNSS system. Certain sources of error apply to the individual pseudorange measurements from each satellite, while others can be considered at the level of the PVT solution.


Pseudorange Errors

Table 3.3 provides a list of the various errors impacting individual pseudorange measurements and their impact on those measurements. The total error listed is the result of accumulating those individual errors in a sum-squared sense and represents the typical errors of a standalone GNSS receiver. As discussed in Section 1.5, most receivers track SBAS satellites which provide substantial corrections to each of these terms, bringing the error down to the more commonly seen 2~m specification for consumer GNSS receivers. And more advanced differential GNSS corrections can eliminate some of these errors entirely.

Table 1.11 : GNSS Pseudorange Error Budget
Orbital 2.5
Satellite Clock 2
Receiver Noise 0.3
Ionospheric 5
Tropospheric 0.5
Multipath 1
Total 11.3

Orbit Errors

Any difference between a satellite’s actual position and expected position will ripple through the entire PVT determination process. While the ground segment monitors and updates these positions, this still accounts for a large portion of the pseudorange error budget, typically contributing about 2.5 m of error.

Satellite Clock

GNSS trilateration uses the speed of light to measure distances, which means that clock errors are equivalent to range errors. A nanosecond-scale error in the satellite’s atomic clock time from relative to GNSS system time results in 0.3 m of pseudorange error and such clock errors typically contribute about 2 m of error.

Receiver Noise

Noise received on the GPS Antenna or from within the receiver itself can contribute a small but not insignificant error to the solution, accounting for around 0.3-1 m of error. Receiver design and antenna quality can significantly impact this error term.

Ionospheric Delay

The ionosphere is the first layer of the atmosphere that a GNSS satellite signal must enter after the vacuum of space, as seen in Figure 3.4. Ranging from 50 km to 1000 km above Earth’s surface, the ionosphere contains ionized gases that act as a dispersive medium and slow the propagation speed of radio waves. Since the refractive index is less than one, the signal speed through the medium slows slightly and the phase increases. The ionosphere is also constantly in flux, varying depending on solar activity, time of year, time of day and therefore is cannot be precisely modelled. Due to the many factors and distance of travel involved, ionospheric delay errors can be around 5 m, the largest source of GNSS error. As mentioned previously, SBAS and other differential GNSS techniques can be used to largely eliminate ionospheric errors. Furthermore, the dispersive nature of the ionosphere causes a higher frequency signal to be slowed less than lower a frequency signal. Due to this, the L1 band experiences less effect than the L2 band, which experiences less than the L5 band. A multi-frequency receiver may use these differences to estimate ionospheric delay directly without external corrections.

Atmospheric Effects on a GNSS Signal
Figure 3.4 Atmospheric Effects on a GNSS Signal

Tropospheric Delay

When a signal enters the troposphere, additional effects come into play affecting signal transmission quality. The troposphere extends from the earth’s surface to a height of about 10-16 km, as seen in Figure 3.4. This layer contains all weather on earth, and most of the atmosphere’s water vapor. While accurate models exist to predict this delay, changes in pressure, temperature, and humidity still affect signal transmission, resulting in about 0.5 m error.


Multipath error occurs when GNSS satellite signals bounce off solid objects such as buildings and terrain resulting in the same initial signal taking multiple paths to get to the receiver. This can result in error effects of 1 m or more for the receiver. Figure 3.5 shows some instances of multipath error.

Multipath Errors
Figure 3.5 Multipath Errors

Dilution of Precision

Beyond the errors in the individual pseudoranges, the geometry of the visible (and tracked) satellites contirbutes to the total PVT error budget. This is known as Dilution of Precision (DOP) and can be calculated in each dimension, including time (since clock errors equal distance errors) and can be combined in a total parameter known as Geometric Dilution of Precision (GDOP). Definitions for the different types of DOP are in Table 3.4.

Table 1.12 : Dilution of Precision Definitions
Horizontal HDOP $\sqrt{\sigma_{_N}^2+\sigma_{_E}^2}$
Vertical VDOP $\sigma_{_D}$
Positional PDOP $\sqrt{\mbox{HDOP}^2+\mbox{VDOP}^2}$
Time TDOP $\sigma_t$
Geometric GDOP $\sqrt{\mbox{PDOP}^2+\mbox{TDOP}^2}$
Good Geometry - Good GDOP
(a) Good Geometry - Good GDOP
Bad Geometry - Poor GDOP
(b) Bad Geometry - Poor GDOP
Bad Visibility - Poor GDOP
(c) Bad Visibility - Poor GDOP
Figure 3.6: Various GDOP Conditions

The GDOP represents a sensitivity of the final PVT solution to errors in the pseudoranges. As such, GDOP valuesare considered ideal when they are low, with values over 5 considered poor. To get a more intuitive understandingof GDOP, the Figure 3.6 contains a few scenarios with varying GDOP. In Figure 3.6a, many well-distributed satellitesare visible to the receiver, yielding low GDOP values. Meanwhile, Figure3.6bshows the visible satellites groupedtogether overhead, which increases VDOP significantly and, subsequently, high GDOP values. Figure 3.6c containsobstructions that both reduces the number of visible satellites, and leaves the remaining satellites grouped together,both of which increase GDOP. Increasing the number of available satellites is especially important in this type ofscenario, which is why a multi-constellation GNSS receiver is much better suited to urban canyon environmentsthan a GPS-only receiver.